Problems of Public Meeting

Public meetings make it easier for societies to come up with the best solutions to their problems. The purpose of public meetings is to address certain challenges affecting different communities. They encourage more people to come together and express their opinions.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Problems of Public Meeting specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The targeted public meeting focused on the issue of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) undertakes similar annual meetings in order to inform the public about the energy issues affecting the country. The purpose of this meeting was to analyze the developments and issues surrounding the use of SMRs. The meeting was organized by the USNRC. The elected officials considered the major problems emerging from the use of SMRs. The facilitator wanted the elected officials to deliver their research findings and opi nions to the public. The function of the advisory committee was to deliver quality information to the interested parties. The organizers enjoined different members of the public. The video can be retrieved from â€Å"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpCWHWysosk†. According to the NRC, public involvement is something critical towards the success of its projects. This practice ensures there is fair regulation of the country’s nuclear industry. Public meetings encourage citizens to present their suggestions. The agency also posts such annual meetings on its website. The agency’s website is â€Å"https://www.nrc.gov/†. The facilitator also ensured the meeting was convenient to the public. The meeting took place in the afternoon. This consideration encouraged more citizens and stakeholders to attend the public meeting. The agency used its premises in order to get the best outcomes.Advertising Looking for term paper on communications media? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This strategy attracted more industrial players, policymakers, and members of the public. The role of the committee was to present its facts on the use of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). The staff identified the opportunities, gaps, and innovations associated with such SMRs. The relevant members of staff also gathered the required feedbacks from different citizens. They also made the relevant suggestions and recommendations depending on the information gathered from the public. They also obtained expert-opinions from different stakeholders in the nuclear energy industry. The citizens were the prime targets of this specific public meeting. The mission of this meeting was to support the use of SMRs. The organizers of the meeting encouraged different citizens to present their feedbacks, questions, and suggestions. Such questions were answered in a professional manner. The agency also encouraged more people to present t heir recommendations. A suggestion box was provided in order to collect more ideas and views from the public. The organizers took most of these ideas into consideration. This fact explains why citizens play a critical role in every public meeting. The other notable thing during the meeting was the role of the media. A number of journalists were evident in the meeting. These journalists took some notes. They also interviewed different stakeholders and scientists. The media is relevant because it informs more citizens about the issues discussed in every meeting. A number of people raised their issues and concerns regarding the use of different nuclear energies. Such individuals were ready to present their special interests. The problem of environmental degradation is currently affecting many communities and societies.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Problems of Public Meeting specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Such Special Interest Groups (SIGs) wanted to understand the commitment of the NRC towards safeguarding the natural environment. It is agreeable that nuclear energy cannot be separated from land management. The agency explained how it was addressing the issues related to land use in the country. The organizers also addressed the connection between urban land-use and nuclear energy production. The organizers of the meeting also addressed the health and economic issues associated with such nuclear plants. The NRC encouraged every attendee to visit its website. Such individuals would learn more about NRC’s nuclear projects. However, the meeting failed to address some critical issues such as the loss of different agricultural lands. It is also anticipated that more land concerns will arise in the future. This development will occur due to the continued acceptance of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). There were no agenda items related to the issue at the other levels of government. T he organizers of the meeting were ready to consider the recommendations presented by different citizens. The agency also undertakes similar meetings every year. This practice shows clearly that the agency has been implementing most of the recommendations presented by different industry players. The agency has also been welcoming many researchers and engineers from different learning institutions. This practice has been supporting the goals of the NRC. The meeting was also characterized by public hearings. Such public hearings influenced the decisions made by the appointed officials. Such officials believed that it was appropriate to consider most of the issues raised by different stakeholders. The NRC always collaborates with the public in order to produce the best outcomes.Advertising Looking for term paper on communications media? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This fact also explains why the NRC always encourages the participation of many stakeholders and the public. I also believe that the agency should attract more stakeholders in order to ensure there is fair management of the industry. The practice will also regulate the American nuclear industry. This practice will produce new policies and practices that can improve the living conditions of many people. The strategy will also address most of the fears associated with the continued use of nuclear energy. The meeting did not identify any issue related to grants from higher levels of government. The meeting focused on the major developments and issues associated with these Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). However, the government should support the project in order to make it more sustainable. This approach will ensure such Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) support the lives of many communities in the country. It would be agreeable that this was a worthwhile public meeting. To begin with, the meeting attracted many people from different sectors. The inclusion of certain stakeholders such as industrial players, engineers, scientists, and researchers resulted in the best results. The participants did not give the best representation of the targeted community. However, the public meeting highlighted the developments associated with Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). This event provided a new opportunity for identifying better practices. This approach was critical towards building consensus. This practice is necessary whenever dealing with specific issues that affect the community. Future meetings should focus on the safety measures associated with these Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Such meetings should also disseminate the necessary decisions, information, and data to every person in the community. This practice has the potential to increase public awareness. It will also ensure more people support the use of nuclear energy. These public meetings are important because they ad dress most of the challenges affecting different communities. The NRC has been using such events to highlight the major developments arising from its nuclear innovations. This fact explains why I am planning to attend similar public meetings in the future. I also made several observations during the meeting. Most of the attendees were ready to interact with different speakers. Most of the speakers were passionate about the targeted agenda. They wanted every person to understand the targeted issues clearly. The professionals in the targeted field avoided the use of difficult words and terminologies. This approach ensured every member of the public understood the intended messages. I think that more people should be encouraged to attend such meetings. This practice will make it easier for them to participate in different policy-making processes. I now understand why organizers should invite different players from every sector. The practice can result in the best policies and ideas. Th e approach will ensure more individuals in the society benefit from these meetings. Public meetings are useful because they inform more people about the issues affecting their societies. These meetings inform the public about the major challenges affecting their lives. They also identify the best practices that can improve their lives. Learning is always an ongoing practice. That being the case, I will always be attending different public meetings even if I am not required to do so. Such meetings will make it easier for me to gain new ideas and concepts. I will also understand how different political leaders are committed towards supporting the needs of their societies. I am also encouraging more people to attend such public meetings. This practice will make it easier for them to make accurate political and economic decisions. This term paper on Problems of Public Meeting was written and submitted by user Cheyanne Q. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Answers to Questions About Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Constructions

Answers to Questions About Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Constructions Answers to Questions About Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Constructions Answers to Questions About Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Constructions By Mark Nichol The following questions from readers pertain to how to distinguish essential information from nonessential information. 1. A colleague of mine wrote, â€Å"Institutions need to be able to collect and collate data in a centralized tool, which is easily accessible and can be mined to inform data-analytics activities.† I corrected it to â€Å"Institutions need to be able to collect and collate data in a centralized tool that is easily accessible and can be mined to inform data-analytics activities,† but she disagrees with the edit. I know I’m right, but how do I explain it to her? In your revision, you have altered the sentence to reflect the writer’s interest in presenting the essential details that the centralized tool is easily accessible and is conducive to data mining. The original version of the sentence offers the details in an offhand fashion, set off as a subordinate clause rather than as part of the main clause. Both versions are grammatically valid, but only your revision conveys the emphasis the writer intends. 2. When is it right to put a comma in front of â€Å"such as†? In many of your examples, I notice that there is no specific standard to using â€Å"such as.† At times, you write it as â€Å", such as,† and at other times, you omit the comma preceding â€Å"such as.† Are there any rules to using a comma before â€Å"such as†? Precede â€Å"such as† with a comma when the phrase that includes the listed examples is not essential to the sentence, such as in â€Å"The program offers team sports, such as basketball and softball, for adults in recreational and competitive leagues.† Omit a comma before â€Å"such as† when the information is essential: â€Å"The program offers team sports such as the ones listed below for adults in both recreational and competitive leagues.† The wording in these examples is identical, but there’s a subtle difference in meaning: The commas in the first example set off the phrase â€Å"such as basketball and softball† as a parenthesis in the main clause â€Å"The program offers team sports for adults in recreational and competitive leagues,† which states that the program is exclusively for adults. The second sentence refers to a list of sports for adults in recreational and competitive leagues, implying that other team sports may be offered that are exclusively for children or are for adults or children alike or are only recreational or only competitive. 3. â€Å"In the sentence ‘Chairs that don’t have cushions are uncomfortable to sit on,’ I think which is acceptable in place of that, because chairs is a nonperson noun. I would appreciate if you let me know why that is the only correct answer.† The fact that chairs refers to a class of objects, rather than people, is irrelevant. That is not the only correct answer, but it is the best one. In American English, most careful writers employ that and which distinctly to clarify the difference in meaning between restrictively and nonrestrictively constructed sentences: â€Å"Chairs that don’t have cushions are uncomfortable to sit on† refers to a particular class of chairs: those without cushions. The implication is that many chairs are comfortable; the ones specifically referred to are a categorical exception. â€Å"Chairs, which don’t have cushions, are uncomfortable to sit on† expresses- erroneously- that all chairs are cushionless. (The phrase â€Å"which don’t have cushions† is parenthetical; it can be omitted without altering the meaning of the basic sentence: â€Å"Chairs are uncomfortable to sit on.† However, this sentence is also incorrect in its assertion.) Some writers will use which in both types of sentences: â€Å"Chairs which don’t have cushions are uncomfortable to sit on† and this is common in British English but most people (at least those in the United States) recognize that the distinctive wording helps strengthen the role of the commas in distinguishing meaning. By the way, although â€Å"Chairs, which don’t have cushions, are uncomfortable to sit on† and the abridged version, â€Å"Chairs are uncomfortable to sit on,† are logically erroneous comfortable chairs certainly do exist (though, unfortunately, I’m not sitting in one right now) a similarly constructed sentence can be valid: â€Å"Ostriches, which can’t fly, rely on their strong legs for mobility.† Conversely, because no ostriches are capable of flight, â€Å"Ostriches that can’t fly rely on their strong legs for mobility† is problematic. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Comparative Forms of AdjectivesDisappointed + Preposition150 Foreign Expressions to Inspire You